|
Hi all,
Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and 82599 chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as officially supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based cards and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? Thanks, Marko _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
On Apr 25, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Marko Zec wrote:
> Hi all, > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and 82599 > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as officially > supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based cards > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? > > Thanks, > > Marko > _______________________________________________ > [hidden email] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" We are using about 10-15 of them without issues on 8.3 and 9.0 STABLE : ix0@pci0:6:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x7a118086 chip=0x10fb8086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82599EB 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection' class = network subclass = ethernet ix1@pci0:6:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0x7a118086 chip=0x10fb8086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82599EB 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection' class = network subclass = ethernet Earlier versions had some issues with vlan tagged traffic, but now they seem pretty stable here. Regards, Nikolay_______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Marko Zec-2
Hi Marko,
I had working on bpf multiqueue support with 82599 in last year(on -CURRENT), there's no issue for me. http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Multiqueue-support-for-bpf-td4703899.html Takuya ASADA 2012/4/25 Marko Zec <[hidden email]>: > Hi all, > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and 82599 > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as officially > supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based cards > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? > > Thanks, > > Marko > _______________________________________________ > [hidden email] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
Hi,
I have it running on fbsd-8.1-r for more than 1.5 years now without issues, i had problem when i first installed it, but they were disappeared when i installed 2.3.8 driver, today there is 2.4 versionon stable. Sami On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Takuya ASADA <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Marko, > > I had working on bpf multiqueue support with 82599 in last year(on > -CURRENT), there's no issue for me. > > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Multiqueue-support-for-bpf-td4703899.html > > Takuya ASADA > > 2012/4/25 Marko Zec <[hidden email]>: > > Hi all, > > > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and 82599 > > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as officially > > supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based > cards > > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Marko > > _______________________________________________ > > [hidden email] mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" > _______________________________________________ > [hidden email] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" > -- Sami Halabi Information Systems Engineer NMS Projects Expert _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
How much traffic are you passing during peak times?
--- On Wed, 4/25/12, Sami Halabi <[hidden email]> wrote: > From: Sami Halabi <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: Intel 10 GbE cards (ixgbe) > To: "Takuya ASADA" <[hidden email]> > Cc: [hidden email], "Marko Zec" <[hidden email]> > Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2012, 10:13 AM > Hi, > I have it running on fbsd-8.1-r for more than 1.5 years now > without issues, > i had problem when i first installed it, but they were > disappeared when i > installed 2.3.8 driver, today there is 2.4 versionon > stable. > > Sami > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Takuya ASADA <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Hi Marko, > > > > I had working on bpf multiqueue support with 82599 in > last year(on > > -CURRENT), there's no issue for me. > > > > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Multiqueue-support-for-bpf-td4703899.html > > > > Takuya ASADA > > > > 2012/4/25 Marko Zec <[hidden email]>: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for > both 82598 and 82599 > > > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 > based cards as officially > > > supported. Does anybody have first-hand > experiences with 82599 based > > cards > > > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, > 9.0, 8.3)? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Marko > > > _______________________________________________ > > > [hidden email] > mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" > > _______________________________________________ > > [hidden email] > mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" > > > > > > -- > Sami Halabi > Information Systems Engineer > NMS Projects Expert > _______________________________________________ > [hidden email] > mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" > [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
for now 6G in production
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Barney Cordoba <[hidden email]>wrote: > How much traffic are you passing during peak times? > > --- On Wed, 4/25/12, Sami Halabi <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > From: Sami Halabi <[hidden email]> > > Subject: Re: Intel 10 GbE cards (ixgbe) > > To: "Takuya ASADA" <[hidden email]> > > Cc: [hidden email], "Marko Zec" <[hidden email]> > > Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2012, 10:13 AM > > Hi, > > I have it running on fbsd-8.1-r for more than 1.5 years now > > without issues, > > i had problem when i first installed it, but they were > > disappeared when i > > installed 2.3.8 driver, today there is 2.4 versionon > > stable. > > > > Sami > > > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Takuya ASADA <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Marko, > > > > > > I had working on bpf multiqueue support with 82599 in > > last year(on > > > -CURRENT), there's no issue for me. > > > > > > > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Multiqueue-support-for-bpf-td4703899.html > > > > > > Takuya ASADA > > > > > > 2012/4/25 Marko Zec <[hidden email]>: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for > > both 82598 and 82599 > > > > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 > > based cards as officially > > > > supported. Does anybody have first-hand > > experiences with 82599 based > > > cards > > > > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, > > 9.0, 8.3)? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Marko > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > [hidden email] > > mailing list > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > [hidden email]" > > > _______________________________________________ > > > [hidden email] > > mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sami Halabi > > Information Systems Engineer > > NMS Projects Expert > > _______________________________________________ > > [hidden email] > > mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" > > > -- Sami Halabi Information Systems Engineer NMS Projects Expert _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Marko Zec-2
Thus spake Marko Zec <[hidden email]>:
> Hi all, > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and 82599 > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as officially > supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based cards > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? We recently bought one: ix0@pci0:34:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' class = network subclass = ethernet ix1@pci0:34:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' class = network subclass = ethernet It's currently used on 9.0 for benchmarking another box. Never had any problems. Can someone say whether the X540 support in CURRENT is stable? Regards, Julian _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
The 82599 is and has been officially supported for some time, the manual
tends to lag, I will try and get it updated. In fact, given a choice I would always go with the 599. And yes, the X540 should be stable, its just not yet being used as much yet. Jack On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Julian Stecklina <[hidden email]> wrote: > Thus spake Marko Zec <[hidden email]>: > > > Hi all, > > > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and 82599 > > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as officially > > supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based > cards > > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? > > We recently bought one: > > ix0@pci0:34:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > ix1@pci0:34:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > It's currently used on 9.0 for benchmarking another box. Never had any > problems. Can someone say whether the X540 support in CURRENT is stable? > > Regards, Julian > > _______________________________________________ > [hidden email] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" > [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
x540has no fbsd driver
Sami On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Jack Vogel <[hidden email]> wrote: > The 82599 is and has been officially supported for some time, the manual > tends to lag, I will try and get it updated. In fact, given a choice I > would always > go with the 599. And yes, the X540 should be stable, its just not yet being > used as much yet. > > Jack > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Julian Stecklina <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Thus spake Marko Zec <[hidden email]>: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and 82599 > > > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as > officially > > > supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based > > cards > > > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? > > > > We recently bought one: > > > > ix0@pci0:34:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 > > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' > > class = network > > subclass = ethernet > > ix1@pci0:34:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 > > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' > > class = network > > subclass = ethernet > > > > It's currently used on 9.0 for benchmarking another box. Never had any > > problems. Can someone say whether the X540 support in CURRENT is stable? > > > > Regards, Julian > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [hidden email] mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" > > > _______________________________________________ > [hidden email] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" > -- Sami Halabi Information Systems Engineer NMS Projects Expert _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
Funny, since I own the driver, one would think I'd know :)
If you go look in the source directory for ixgbe you'll find a couple files in there: ixgbe_x540.[ch]. That should be a clue... Jack On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Sami Halabi <[hidden email]> wrote: > x540has no fbsd driver > > Sami > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Jack Vogel <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> The 82599 is and has been officially supported for some time, the manual >> tends to lag, I will try and get it updated. In fact, given a choice I >> would always >> go with the 599. And yes, the X540 should be stable, its just not yet >> being >> used as much yet. >> >> Jack >> >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Julian Stecklina <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> > Thus spake Marko Zec <[hidden email]>: >> > >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and >> 82599 >> > > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as >> officially >> > > supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based >> > cards >> > > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? >> > >> > We recently bought one: >> > >> > ix0@pci0:34:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 >> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >> > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' >> > class = network >> > subclass = ethernet >> > ix1@pci0:34:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 >> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >> > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' >> > class = network >> > subclass = ethernet >> > >> > It's currently used on 9.0 for benchmarking another box. Never had any >> > problems. Can someone say whether the X540 support in CURRENT is stable? >> > >> > Regards, Julian >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > [hidden email] mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> [hidden email] mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" >> > > > > -- > Sami Halabi > Information Systems Engineer > NMS Projects Expert > > [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
Just so everyone is clear, the ixgbe driver in 8.3 has X540 support, as
well as HEAD, stable/9 has not yet been MFC'd, its on my 'todo' list. Jack On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jack Vogel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Funny, since I own the driver, one would think I'd know :) > > If you go look in the source directory for ixgbe you'll find a couple files > in there: ixgbe_x540.[ch]. That should be a clue... > > Jack > > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Sami Halabi <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> x540has no fbsd driver >> >> Sami >> >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Jack Vogel <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> The 82599 is and has been officially supported for some time, the manual >>> tends to lag, I will try and get it updated. In fact, given a choice I >>> would always >>> go with the 599. And yes, the X540 should be stable, its just not yet >>> being >>> used as much yet. >>> >>> Jack >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Julian Stecklina <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> > Thus spake Marko Zec <[hidden email]>: >>> > >>> > > Hi all, >>> > > >>> > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and >>> 82599 >>> > > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as >>> officially >>> > > supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based >>> > cards >>> > > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? >>> > >>> > We recently bought one: >>> > >>> > ix0@pci0:34:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 >>> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >>> > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >>> > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' >>> > class = network >>> > subclass = ethernet >>> > ix1@pci0:34:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 >>> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >>> > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >>> > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' >>> > class = network >>> > subclass = ethernet >>> > >>> > It's currently used on 9.0 for benchmarking another box. Never had any >>> > problems. Can someone say whether the X540 support in CURRENT is >>> stable? >>> > >>> > Regards, Julian >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > [hidden email] mailing list >>> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [hidden email] mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sami Halabi >> Information Systems Engineer >> NMS Projects Expert >> >> > [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Jack Vogel
Hi,
I KNOW you own the driver,i just mentioned that because its not listed on intel's site,and that would be a base for decisions when someone want to pick a card that works on fbsd:) so its better get listed as well, no one is going to check *.c files. Sami On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Jack Vogel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Funny, since I own the driver, one would think I'd know :) > > If you go look in the source directory for ixgbe you'll find a couple files > in there: ixgbe_x540.[ch]. That should be a clue... > > Jack > > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Sami Halabi <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> x540has no fbsd driver >> >> Sami >> >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Jack Vogel <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> The 82599 is and has been officially supported for some time, the manual >>> tends to lag, I will try and get it updated. In fact, given a choice I >>> would always >>> go with the 599. And yes, the X540 should be stable, its just not yet >>> being >>> used as much yet. >>> >>> Jack >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Julian Stecklina <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> > Thus spake Marko Zec <[hidden email]>: >>> > >>> > > Hi all, >>> > > >>> > > Although the ixgbe driver appears to have code for both 82598 and >>> 82599 >>> > > chipsets, the manual page stil lists only 82598 based cards as >>> officially >>> > > supported. Does anybody have first-hand experiences with 82599 based >>> > cards >>> > > and recent versions of the ixgbe driver (-CURRENT, 9.0, 8.3)? >>> > >>> > We recently bought one: >>> > >>> > ix0@pci0:34:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 >>> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >>> > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >>> > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' >>> > class = network >>> > subclass = ethernet >>> > ix1@pci0:34:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0xa02c8086 chip=0x151c8086 >>> > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >>> > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >>> > device = '82599EB 10 Gigabit TN Network Connection' >>> > class = network >>> > subclass = ethernet >>> > >>> > It's currently used on 9.0 for benchmarking another box. Never had any >>> > problems. Can someone say whether the X540 support in CURRENT is >>> stable? >>> > >>> > Regards, Julian >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > [hidden email] mailing list >>> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [hidden email] mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sami Halabi >> Information Systems Engineer >> NMS Projects Expert >> >> > -- Sami Halabi Information Systems Engineer NMS Projects Expert _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
