Re: bin/167128: ps(1): 'ps -e' or 'pw -wwe' doesn't display the environment of 32-bit processes (amd64-specific)

[linimon]

Old Synopsis: 'ps -e' or 'pw -wwe' doesn't display the environment of 32-bit processes
New Synopsis: ps(1): 'ps -e' or 'pw -wwe' doesn't display the environment of 32-bit processes (amd64-specific)

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Apr 21 05:38:25 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm not really sure how to classify this, but it isn't hardware-related,
so move it over to bin/.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167128
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"

[John Baldwin]

On Saturday, April 21, 2012 1:39:36 am [hidden email] wrote:
> Old Synopsis: 'ps -e' or 'pw -wwe' doesn't display the environment of 32-bit
processes
> New Synopsis: ps(1): 'ps -e' or 'pw -wwe' doesn't display the environment of
32-bit processes (amd64-specific)
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-bugs
> Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
> Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Apr 21 05:38:25 UTC 2012
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> I'm not really sure how to classify this, but it isn't hardware-related,
> so move it over to bin/.

Well, the 32-on-64 bit is somewhat amd64-specific (though we have that same
issue on powerpc now).

However, can the submitter test this on 9-stable?  There were some changes
MFC'd after 9.0 that might fix this.

--
John Baldwin
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"