|
Synopsis: Unbroke archivers/lzo2 on i386
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: edwin State-Changed-When: Thu Aug 14 00:00:18 UTC 2008 State-Changed-Why: Awaiting maintainers feedback (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=126518 _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
The following reply was made to PR ports/126518; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Edwin Groothuis <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Cc: [hidden email] Subject: Re: ports/126518: Unbroke archivers/lzo2 on i386 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:15 UT Maintainer of archivers/lzo2, Please note that PR ports/126518 has just been submitted. If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch and a committer will take care of it. The full text of the PR can be found at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/126518 -- Edwin Groothuis via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool [hidden email] _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Edwin Groothuis-2
The following reply was made to PR ports/126518; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Matthias Andree <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Cc: Subject: Re: ports/126518: Unbroke archivers/lzo2 on i386 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:36:11 +0200 On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Please note that PR ports/126518 has just been submitted. Not my business. I didn't mark lzo2 broken and wouldn't have approved of it. lzo2 builds fine on my 6-STABLE and 7-STABLE i386 machines. And if ports are marked broken behind my back, I'll just stop maintaining ports and do not want to be bothered with the fallout. I'd suggest to revert ports/archivers/lzo2/Makefile rev 1.43 to 1.42. I know I have a virtual 8-CURRENT machine to log into so I can investigate, but I have a real-life job to do as well, so I cannot always respond "over night". -- Matthias Andree _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Edwin Groothuis-2
The following reply was made to PR ports/126518; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Matthias Andree <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Cc: Subject: Re: ports/126518: Unbroke archivers/lzo2 on i386 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:56:45 +0200 Alternatively and untested, just try what happens if you commit the patch from this PR. I simply don't want to be bothered with unnecessary extra work, I have sufficiently little time to be rather annoyed by erwin's marking the port broken while security/* ports depend on it. -- Matthias Andree _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Edwin Groothuis-2
The following reply was made to PR ports/126518; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Rick van der Zwet" <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email], [hidden email] Cc: [hidden email] Subject: Re: ports/126518: Unbroke archivers/lzo2 on i386 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:27:13 +0200 I truly think the maintainer is right about this, the problem is a false negative of the automated build/test grid. The maintainer clearly notes a might take a few minutes to complete (without any output): http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.8.20080809105349/lzo2-2.03_1.log ===> Running self-tests for lzo2-2.03_1 (can take a few minutes, without output) But the testgrid only allows it 7200 seconds: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.8.20080809105349/lzo2-2.03_1.log /pnohang: killing make build (lzo2-2.03_1, pid 40244 and 40242) since no output in 7200 seconds since Sat Aug 9 17:12:37 2008 Just disabling the test, as suggested in the patch of ports/126518 will I my opinion not be the right choice. As no time limits are given into the porters handbook (and properly never will), best to adjust the test system. Included linimon, who should shine his brilliant lights on the matter :-) I guess. /Rick -- http://rickvanderzwet.nl _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
