The following reply was made to PR ports/165842; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dominic Fandrey <
[hidden email]>
To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <
[hidden email]>
Cc:
[hidden email]
Subject: Re: ports/165842: [maintainer-update] games/ioquake3 and slaves
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 16:55:42 +0200
On 18/05/2012 13:17, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote on 18.05.2012 15:09:
>> On 18/05/2012 11:28, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>> Dominic Fandrey wrote on 18.05.2012 13:14:
>>>> On 17/05/2012 21:56,
[hidden email] wrote:
>>>>> Hi Dominic! I'm used your latest shar and diff and there is some
>>>>> problems with the ports. Would you please look at this logs and fix
>>>>> them? Thanks.
http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/ioquake3/ >>>>
>>>> I have nailed down the ioq3-devel issue, but I've cannot reproduce
>>>> the urban-terrror-data issue. The port sets NO_BUILD.
>>>>
>>>> I have to ponder this one a little.
>>>
>>> Just comment NO_BUILD and NO_PACKAGE and try to build (they commented
>>> out for tinderbox I thinks because of distfile size).
>>
>> Don't mess with NO_BUILD. I see no reason to.
>> I generally just add FORCE_PACKAGE to my Tinderbox env.
>
> Yeah, I misunderstood something. So are you able to reproduce the breakage? Or it was initiated by commenting off the NO_BUILD?
That's definitely the cause. Basically I sped up the the -data ports
by extracting files into place during install instead of extracting
them and copying them around.
> Haven't this updated ports on hands atm, so can't see myself.
>>
>>> And what the solution is for ioquake3-devel?
>>
>> In ioquake3/Makefile:
>> .if !defined(WITHOUT_SERVER)
>> RUN_DEPENDS+= ${Q3SERVER}${PORTSDIR}/games/${PORTNAME}-server
>> .endif
>>
>> Should be:
>> .if !defined(WITHOUT_SERVER)
>> RUN_DEPENDS+= ${Q3SERVER}${BINSUFFIX}:${PORTSDIR}/games/${PORTNAME}-server
>> .endif
>>
>> Do you want the updated patch?
>
> No, I will apply this and recheck. Thank you.
That should do.
You can also remove the WRKSRC= line from urbanterror-data/Makefile.
And thank you. I thought I had everything Tinderbox tested.
Regards
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugsTo unsubscribe, send any mail to "
[hidden email]"
Locked
