|
Hey, I have a question that I can't seem to find a decent answer to. The mailing lists have had some similar topics, but they were mostly for the 6.x-RELEASE and other minor differences.
Heres my situation; I'm trying to create a beowulf cluster running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE consisting of 8 systems all running on Dual Xeon w/HTT both running at 2.8Gz. What exactly this system will be doing I can't say, so lets just think about the performance of the cluster running a benchmarking tool similar to sysbench. Because they are dual processor systems, I will be using the SMP kernel already, so I'm wondering if turning on HTT will help or hinder my Beowulf' performance. The cluster is not yet operational, otherwise I would do some tests myself! Thanks! -- Michael B. Stogsdill Sycamore.US Inc Software Engineer/Security Administrator _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
Michael Stogsdill wrote:
> Hey, I have a question that I can't seem to find a decent answer to. The mailing lists have had some similar topics, but they were mostly for the 6.x-RELEASE and other minor differences. > > Heres my situation; I'm trying to create a beowulf cluster running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE consisting of 8 systems all running on Dual Xeon w/HTT both running at 2.8Gz. What exactly this system will be doing I can't say, so lets just think about the performance of the cluster running a benchmarking tool similar to sysbench. Because they are dual processor systems, I will be using the SMP kernel already, so I'm wondering if turning on HTT will help or hinder my Beowulf' performance. The cluster is not yet operational, otherwise I would do some tests myself! The answer is always "HTT performance depends on your workload. Try it and see if it helps". Kris _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Michael Stogsdill
Michael Stogsdill wrote:
> Hey, I have a question that I can't seem to find a decent answer to. The mailing lists have had some similar topics, but they were mostly for the 6.x-RELEASE and other minor differences. > > Heres my situation; I'm trying to create a beowulf cluster running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE consisting of 8 systems all running on Dual Xeon w/HTT both running at 2.8Gz. What exactly this system will be doing I can't say, so lets just think about the performance of the cluster running a benchmarking tool similar to sysbench. Because they are dual processor systems, I will be using the SMP kernel already, so I'm wondering if turning on HTT will help or hinder my Beowulf' performance. The cluster is not yet operational, otherwise I would do some tests myself! > > Thanks! My personal experience is that HTT did help. This was with an older Xeon dual processor system, and I was running multithreaded programs that were basically huge amounts of floating point calculations (a bit like FFT). Also, recent advances in FreeBSD have made it extremely good at running multithreaded programs, but I still think it would be worthwhile trying Linux as well. In the old days, Linux did much better, and who knows, they might have advanced ahead again. Since you are looking to get overy ounce of performance out of your computers, I would try out all the possibilities and see what works best. (And to answer your question, I found recent versions of FreeBSD slightly better than Linux at taking advantage of HTT in my particular applications.) _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Kris Kennaway-3
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Michael Stogsdill wrote: >> Hey, I have a question that I can't seem to find a decent answer to. >> The mailing lists have had some similar topics, but they were mostly >> for the 6.x-RELEASE and other minor differences. >> Heres my situation; I'm trying to create a beowulf cluster running >> FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE consisting of 8 systems all running on Dual Xeon >> w/HTT both running at 2.8Gz. What exactly this system will be doing I >> can't say, so lets just think about the performance of the cluster >> running a benchmarking tool similar to sysbench. Because they are dual >> processor systems, I will be using the SMP kernel already, so I'm >> wondering if turning on HTT will help or hinder my Beowulf' >> performance. The cluster is not yet operational, otherwise I would do >> some tests myself! > > The answer is always "HTT performance depends on your workload. Try it > and see if it helps". new processors are not quite as bad as the original HTT processors. also, if the workload includes a mix of FP and integer work it will be worth having them on. > > Kris > _______________________________________________ > [hidden email] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> > My personal experience is that HTT did help. This was with an older > Xeon dual processor system, and I was running multithreaded programs > that were basically huge amounts of floating point calculations (a bit > like FFT). In my experience HTT helps 20-30% in a well engineered workload. Extreme care needs to be taken on minimizing synchronization primitive overhead or that will take away your gain. (don't have 4 or 8 threads hammering on one mutex a million times a second) Pete _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
