pkg-plist, +CONTENTS, make package, and the ports cluster
Locked
 
|
|
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 05:25:56PM -0600, Jon Passki wrote:
> Hello, > > Ports such as mysql-server, apache22 and many others I've noticed > have a disconnect between pkg-plist entries and what actually gets > installed. Some especially annoying components missed are etc/rc.d > scripts or in the case of gettext, a library file. In the short term > I was going to create a PR for some of these ports. My major > assumption, with variables enumerated, a +CONTENTS file should be a > subset of a pkg-plist file. With this, my basic approach was to diff > the +CONTENTS file from the build system and the +CONTENTS file from > the install via pkg_add system (ignoring comments, sample output > below). Should these files be the same? When would they not be > (again, stripping comments)? This output could be used to check the > pkg-plist file, accepting that variables in the pkg-plist will need > to be enumerated. Is this a decent method? > > In the long term, would this be something that makes sense for the > ports cluster to check on? Are there situations where a port may > install something that a pkg-plist file should never record? seeing differences, this is presumably for some other local reason. In particular gettext, mysql-server and apache22 do not install extra files or have missing files when built in a default freebsd environment. > diff -u /tmp/+CONTENTS_make_install_apache22 /tmp/ > +CONTENTS_make_package_apache22 | head > --- /tmp/+CONTENTS_make_install_apache22 Sun Jan 28 21:52:47 2007 > +++ /tmp/+CONTENTS_make_package_apache22 Sun Jan 28 21:53:39 2007 > @@ -567,739 +567,16 @@ > @unexec rmdir %D/etc/apache22 2> /dev/null || echo "===> If you plan > to do not reinstall apache22, you can safely remove %D/etc/apache22." > @exec /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib > @unexec /sbin/ldconfig -R > -share/doc/apache22/LICENSE > -share/doc/apache22/NOTICE > -share/doc/apache22/bind.html > -share/doc/apache22/bind.html.de these files on my system. Kris |
attachment0 (194 bytes) |
|
|
|
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 06:55:59PM -0600, Jon Passki wrote:
> > I am unable to replicate this: the apache22 port does not install > > these files on my system. > > I was able to replicate devel/pth on my system (pay attention to > libdata/ldconfig/pth at the bottom). I can go back and do a complete > install again for the others. > > # cat /etc/make.conf > # port stuff > WRKDIRPREFIX="/tmp" > DISTDIR="/var/backups/distfiles" > PACKAGES="/var/backups/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release" > # added by use.perl 2007-01-23 17:20:15 > PERL_VER=5.8.8 > PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 > > # cd /usr/ports/devel/pth > # make deinstall > # make clean > # rm -rf /tmp/All /tmp/devel /tmp/Latest /tmp/usr > # make package PACKAGES="/tmp" > # tar -xjf /tmp/All/pth-2.0.7.tbz -C /tmp +CONTENTS > # diff -u /tmp/+CONTENTS /var/db/pkg/pth-2.0.7/+CONTENTS > --- /tmp/+CONTENTS Mon Jan 29 00:46:32 2007 > +++ /var/db/pkg/pth-2.0.7/+CONTENTS Mon Jan 29 00:46:32 2007 > @@ -40,14 +40,5 @@ > @dirrm lib/pth > @exec /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib/pth > @unexec /sbin/ldconfig -R > -@cwd . > -@ignore > -+COMMENT > -@comment MD5:fe3390e01609cef4464e3da82ca715eb > -@ignore > -+DESC > -@comment MD5:5857a78166a3bfc28f7d918d443db7d0 > -@ignore > -+MTREE_DIRS > -@comment MD5:62ec091098aedd20983344152fd56afb > -@mtree +MTREE_DIRS > +libdata/ldconfig/pth > +@comment MD5:4f8e8d8ed05f7e16d74fc8d39b779d38 > # ll /usr/local/libdata/ldconfig/pth > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 19 Jan 29 00:46 /usr/local/libdata/ > ldconfig/pth package for me. Are you sure you have an up-to-date ports collection (in particular Mk/)? This is added to the pkg-plist by the USE_LDCONFIG logic. xor# grep -r ldconfig/pth /var/db/pkg/pth-2.0.7/ +CONTENTS /var/db/pkg/pth-2.0.7/+CONTENTS:libdata/ldconfig/pth +CONTENTS:libdata/ldconfig/pth Kris |
|
|
|
|
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 07:21:03PM -0600, Jon Passki wrote:
> > xor# grep -r ldconfig/pth /var/db/pkg/pth-2.0.7/ +CONTENTS > > /var/db/pkg/pth-2.0.7/+CONTENTS:libdata/ldconfig/pth > > +CONTENTS:libdata/ldconfig/pth > > This was a pretty recent (within a day) port update w/ a slightly > custom supfile [1]. Got any suggestions on things I could look for? > Are you taking a look at the installed +CONTENTS file or the one > included in the package created by `make package` and friends? I'm comparing both, the latter file was extracted from the freshly made package. The only thing I can think of is that you are actually extracting stale packages instead of the freshly made ones. Your ports collection is incomplete since you drop a number of the categories. Maybe that is related, otherwise I can't imagine what would cause this. Kris |
|
|
Loading...
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |