Quantcast

yelp update ?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
14 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

yelp update ?

Ronald F. Guilmette-2


Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please tell
me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010?

I ask because, as it happens, there was a small but critical change made
to one of the files in yelp quite along time ago, and in the absence of
this small change, the built-in Help functionality of gthumb, evince,
braceros, and dog only knows how many other Gnome applications simply
will not work.

The change in question is as follows:


*** yelp.desktop.in.in-20100803124138 2010-08-03 12:41:38.000000000 -0700
--- yelp.desktop.in.in 2012-05-10 04:39:24.000000000 -0700
***************
*** 3,7 ****
  _Comment=Get help with GNOME
  OnlyShowIn=GNOME;
! Exec=yelp
  Icon=help-browser
  StartupNotify=true
--- 3,7 ----
  _Comment=Get help with GNOME
  OnlyShowIn=GNOME;
! Exec=yelp %u
  Icon=help-browser
  StartupNotify=true
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Jeremy Messenger-2
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
<[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please tell
> me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010?

Because it's latest version of GNOME 2.x. You should ask GNOME folks
why they stopped update the 2.x version.

> I ask because, as it happens, there was a small but critical change made
> to one of the files in yelp quite along time ago, and in the absence of
> this small change, the built-in Help functionality of gthumb, evince,
> braceros, and dog only knows how many other Gnome applications simply
> will not work.
>
> The change in question is as follows:

All of your reports in last a few days are already in the PR in a few
weeks ago with patch available. Before you ask me why I do not commit
it? Because I have GNOME 3 installed and I can't test GNOME 2 until I
uninstall GNOME 3 and test GNOME 2 to allow me to touch a lot of PRs.

Cheers,
Mezz


> *** yelp.desktop.in.in-20100803124138   2010-08-03 12:41:38.000000000 -0700
> --- yelp.desktop.in.in  2012-05-10 04:39:24.000000000 -0700
> ***************
> *** 3,7 ****
>  _Comment=Get help with GNOME
>  OnlyShowIn=GNOME;
> ! Exec=yelp
>  Icon=help-browser
>  StartupNotify=true
> --- 3,7 ----
>  _Comment=Get help with GNOME
>  OnlyShowIn=GNOME;
> ! Exec=yelp %u
>  Icon=help-browser
>  StartupNotify=true
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"


--
[hidden email] - [hidden email]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [hidden email]
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
In reply to this post by Ronald F. Guilmette-2
Hi Ronald,

I can confirm that I can't see help in evince both with this patch, and
w/o it. Should I do anything extra to make it work?

Ronald F. Guilmette wrote on 10.05.2012 15:40:

> Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please tell
> me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010?
>
> I ask because, as it happens, there was a small but critical change made
> to one of the files in yelp quite along time ago, and in the absence of
> this small change, the built-in Help functionality of gthumb, evince,
> braceros, and dog only knows how many other Gnome applications simply
> will not work.
>
> The change in question is as follows:
>
>
> *** yelp.desktop.in.in-20100803124138 2010-08-03 12:41:38.000000000 -0700
> --- yelp.desktop.in.in 2012-05-10 04:39:24.000000000 -0700
> ***************
> *** 3,7 ****
>    _Comment=Get help with GNOME
>    OnlyShowIn=GNOME;
> ! Exec=yelp
>    Icon=help-browser
>    StartupNotify=true
> --- 3,7 ----
>    _Comment=Get help with GNOME
>    OnlyShowIn=GNOME;
> ! Exec=yelp %u
>    Icon=help-browser
>    StartupNotify=true



--
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Jeremy Messenger-2
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Ronald,
>
> I can confirm that I can't see help in evince both with this patch, and w/o
> it. Should I do anything extra to make it work?

A complete patch is in ports/167386. The patch needs to be edited by
not need to change the X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Version and maybe Categories
too.

Will need to add 'desktopfileutils' in USE_GNOME and manual runs
update-desktop-database in post-patch if yelp's Makefile doesn't has
it already. Same goes for add shared-mime-info dependency and manual
runs update-mime-database in post-patch.

If it works for you, feel free to commit patch and close the PR.

Cheers,
Mezz


> Ronald F. Guilmette wrote on 10.05.2012 15:40:
>
>> Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please
>> tell
>> me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010?
>>
>> I ask because, as it happens, there was a small but critical change made
>> to one of the files in yelp quite along time ago, and in the absence of
>> this small change, the built-in Help functionality of gthumb, evince,
>> braceros, and dog only knows how many other Gnome applications simply
>> will not work.
>>
>> The change in question is as follows:
>>
>>
>> *** yelp.desktop.in.in-20100803124138   2010-08-03 12:41:38.000000000
>> -0700
>> --- yelp.desktop.in.in  2012-05-10 04:39:24.000000000 -0700
>> ***************
>> *** 3,7 ****
>>   _Comment=Get help with GNOME
>>   OnlyShowIn=GNOME;
>> ! Exec=yelp
>>   Icon=help-browser
>>   StartupNotify=true
>> --- 3,7 ----
>>   _Comment=Get help with GNOME
>>   OnlyShowIn=GNOME;
>> ! Exec=yelp %u
>>   Icon=help-browser
>>   StartupNotify=true
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ruslan
>
> Tinderboxing kills... the drives.


--
[hidden email] - [hidden email]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [hidden email]
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Jeremy Messenger-2
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jeremy Messenger
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi Ronald,
>>
>> I can confirm that I can't see help in evince both with this patch, and w/o
>> it. Should I do anything extra to make it work?
>
> A complete patch is in ports/167386. The patch needs to be edited by
> not need to change the X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Version and maybe Categories
> too.
>
> Will need to add 'desktopfileutils' in USE_GNOME and manual runs
> update-desktop-database in post-patch if yelp's Makefile doesn't has
> it already. Same goes for add shared-mime-info dependency and manual
> runs update-mime-database in post-patch.
>
> If it works for you, feel free to commit patch and close the PR.

Pav has committed it, so nevermind. Thanks Pav!

Cheers,
Mezz


> Cheers,
> Mezz
>
>
>> Ronald F. Guilmette wrote on 10.05.2012 15:40:
>>
>>> Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please
>>> tell
>>> me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010?
>>>
>>> I ask because, as it happens, there was a small but critical change made
>>> to one of the files in yelp quite along time ago, and in the absence of
>>> this small change, the built-in Help functionality of gthumb, evince,
>>> braceros, and dog only knows how many other Gnome applications simply
>>> will not work.
>>>
>>> The change in question is as follows:
>>>
>>>
>>> *** yelp.desktop.in.in-20100803124138   2010-08-03 12:41:38.000000000
>>> -0700
>>> --- yelp.desktop.in.in  2012-05-10 04:39:24.000000000 -0700
>>> ***************
>>> *** 3,7 ****
>>>   _Comment=Get help with GNOME
>>>   OnlyShowIn=GNOME;
>>> ! Exec=yelp
>>>   Icon=help-browser
>>>   StartupNotify=true
>>> --- 3,7 ----
>>>   _Comment=Get help with GNOME
>>>   OnlyShowIn=GNOME;
>>> ! Exec=yelp %u
>>>   Icon=help-browser
>>>   StartupNotify=true
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Ruslan
>>
>> Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
>
>
> --
> [hidden email] - [hidden email]
> FreeBSD GNOME Team
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [hidden email]



--
[hidden email] - [hidden email]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [hidden email]
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
In reply to this post by Jeremy Messenger-2
Hi Jeremy,

Jeremy Messenger wrote on 10.05.2012 18:40:

> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>> Hi Ronald,
>>
>> I can confirm that I can't see help in evince both with this patch, and w/o
>> it. Should I do anything extra to make it work?
>
> A complete patch is in ports/167386. The patch needs to be edited by
> not need to change the X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Version and maybe Categories
> too.
>
> Will need to add 'desktopfileutils' in USE_GNOME and manual runs
> update-desktop-database in post-patch if yelp's Makefile doesn't has
> it already. Same goes for add shared-mime-info dependency and manual
> runs update-mime-database in post-patch.
>
> If it works for you, feel free to commit patch and close the PR.
>
> Cheers,
> Mezz

Yes, I already found this PR. The only thing that's need to be added is
this:

MimeType=x-scheme-handler/ghelp;x-scheme-handler/help;x-scheme-handler/info;x-scheme-handler/man;

All other changes to yelp.desktop are not relevant and seems were
directly copied from linuxmint forum.

Ok, thanks. I'll check if databases updates after yelp reinstall and
commit it.


--
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
In reply to this post by Jeremy Messenger-2
Jeremy Messenger wrote on 10.05.2012 18:43:

> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jeremy Messenger
> <[hidden email]>  wrote:
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>>> Hi Ronald,
>>>
>>> I can confirm that I can't see help in evince both with this patch, and w/o
>>> it. Should I do anything extra to make it work?
>>
>> A complete patch is in ports/167386. The patch needs to be edited by
>> not need to change the X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Version and maybe Categories
>> too.
>>
>> Will need to add 'desktopfileutils' in USE_GNOME and manual runs
>> update-desktop-database in post-patch if yelp's Makefile doesn't has
>> it already. Same goes for add shared-mime-info dependency and manual
>> runs update-mime-database in post-patch.
>>
>> If it works for you, feel free to commit patch and close the PR.
>
> Pav has committed it, so nevermind. Thanks Pav!
>
> Cheers,
> Mezz

No, he just added yelp to RUN_DEPENDS. But it will not work by itself.


--
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
In reply to this post by Jeremy Messenger-2
Jeremy Messenger wrote on 10.05.2012 18:43:

> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jeremy Messenger
> <[hidden email]>  wrote:
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>>> Hi Ronald,
>>>
>>> I can confirm that I can't see help in evince both with this patch, and w/o
>>> it. Should I do anything extra to make it work?
>>
>> A complete patch is in ports/167386. The patch needs to be edited by
>> not need to change the X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Version and maybe Categories
>> too.
>>
>> Will need to add 'desktopfileutils' in USE_GNOME and manual runs
>> update-desktop-database in post-patch if yelp's Makefile doesn't has
>> it already. Same goes for add shared-mime-info dependency and manual
>> runs update-mime-database in post-patch.
>>
>> If it works for you, feel free to commit patch and close the PR.
>
> Pav has committed it, so nevermind. Thanks Pav!
>
> Cheers,
> Mezz

Ah, I now see. Sorry :)

--
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Ronald F. Guilmette-2
In reply to this post by Jeremy Messenger-2

In message <CADLFttfPnW=[hidden email]>
, Jeremy Messenger <[hidden email]> wrote:

>On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
><[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please tell
>> me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010?
>
>Because it's latest version of GNOME 2.x.

Regarding that assertion...

What is in the ports tree is yelp version 2.30.2.  But as you can see here:

   http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/yelp/

There were several more 2.x.x versions after that, presumably all generally
compatible with GNOME 2.x, specifically:

2.31.1
2.31.2
2.31.3
2.31.4
2.31.5
2.31.6
2.31.7

2.91.8
2.91.9   <==== fixes the %u issue
2.91.10
2.91.90
2.91.91
2.91.92

>You should ask GNOME folks why they stopped update the 2.x version.

I am guessing that they would probably say that it was because they moved
on to work on 3.x.  No?

>All of your reports in last a few days are already in the PR in a few
>weeks ago with patch available. Before you ask me why I do not commit
>it?

You read my mind.
:-)

>Because I have GNOME 3 installed and I can't test GNOME 2 until I
>uninstall GNOME 3 and test GNOME 2 to allow me to touch a lot of PRs.

I understand your difficulty here.  However I am inclined to ask if you
have been laboring under this unfortunate impediment since circa Sept. 28,
2010.

Well, in any event, to the extent that I can, I'd like to be of assistance.
I do have a spare (older) Athlon XP system that I could probably afford to
ship to you, if you are not too far away from me.  (But it is _only_ the
tower... no monitor, keybpard, or mouse.)  And also, I have a couple of
these things lying around that I'm not using (and a few that I am):

http://www.amazon.com/Genica-Mobile-Rack-Removable-Black/dp/B000FA0W80/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1336689460&sr=1-2

Personally, I have found them to be very handy for developing on multiple
playforms and/or under multiple environments.

I probably could scrounge up a spare drive or two also.  Please let me know
if any of this stuff would be at all helpful.

I do understand that it is difficult to develop stuff when you hare dealing
with multiple versions of something that are constantly changing out from
under you all of the time.


Regards,
rfg
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Jeremy Messenger-2
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
<[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> In message <CADLFttfPnW=[hidden email]>
> , Jeremy Messenger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
>><[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please tell
>>> me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010?
>>
>>Because it's latest version of GNOME 2.x.
>
> Regarding that assertion...
>
> What is in the ports tree is yelp version 2.30.2.  But as you can see here:
>
>   http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/yelp/
>
> There were several more 2.x.x versions after that, presumably all generally
> compatible with GNOME 2.x, specifically:
>
> 2.31.1
> 2.31.2
> 2.31.3
> 2.31.4
> 2.31.5
> 2.31.6
> 2.31.7
>
> 2.91.8
> 2.91.9   <==== fixes the %u issue
> 2.91.10
> 2.91.90
> 2.91.91
> 2.91.92

The odd number is a development version. Even number is a stable
version. Therefore, 2.30.2 is a latest version of 2.x.

http://library.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/

>>You should ask GNOME folks why they stopped update the 2.x version.
>
> I am guessing that they would probably say that it was because they moved
> on to work on 3.x.  No?

Yep. MATE is trying to fork GNOME 2 and keep it alive.

http://mate-desktop.org/
http://wiki.mate-desktop.org/roadmap

I want to try to work on MATE in this summer. I am hoping to finish
GNOME 3.4.x in June.

>>All of your reports in last a few days are already in the PR in a few
>>weeks ago with patch available. Before you ask me why I do not commit
>>it?
>
> You read my mind.
> :-)
>
>>Because I have GNOME 3 installed and I can't test GNOME 2 until I
>>uninstall GNOME 3 and test GNOME 2 to allow me to touch a lot of PRs.
>
> I understand your difficulty here.  However I am inclined to ask if you
> have been laboring under this unfortunate impediment since circa Sept. 28,
> 2010.

Who care about the date? It is a latest stable version. We finally got
this bug report in 2012! It took about one and half year for anyone to
find this bug. It shows that how many people click on the help?

> Well, in any event, to the extent that I can, I'd like to be of assistance.
> I do have a spare (older) Athlon XP system that I could probably afford to
> ship to you, if you are not too far away from me.  (But it is _only_ the
> tower... no monitor, keybpard, or mouse.)  And also, I have a couple of
> these things lying around that I'm not using (and a few that I am):
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Genica-Mobile-Rack-Removable-Black/dp/B000FA0W80/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1336689460&sr=1-2
>
> Personally, I have found them to be very handy for developing on multiple
> playforms and/or under multiple environments.
>
> I probably could scrounge up a spare drive or two also.  Please let me know
> if any of this stuff would be at all helpful.
>
> I do understand that it is difficult to develop stuff when you hare dealing
> with multiple versions of something that are constantly changing out from
> under you all of the time.

Thanks for offer. But sorry, I do not allow anyone to donate me now
until I can actually work on FreeBSD much more like what I did two
years ago. What you did last a few days have 'donated' to me, so
thanks for find bug and submit patch!

BTW: freebsd-gnome@ and gnome@ are same. Removing one of it from CC.

Cheers,
Mezz


> Regards,
> rfg


--
[hidden email] - [hidden email]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [hidden email]
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Ronald F. Guilmette-2

In message <CADLFttf=tUxw5y4Yte+f=[hidden email]>
, you wrote:

>> 2.31.1
>> 2.31.2
>> 2.31.3
>> 2.31.4
>> 2.31.5
>> 2.31.6
>> 2.31.7
>>
>> 2.91.8
>> 2.91.9 <==== fixes the %u issue
>> 2.91.10
>> 2.91.90
>> 2.91.91
>> 2.91.92
>
>The odd number is a development version. Even number is a stable
>version. Therefore, 2.30.2 is a latest version of 2.x.

Ummm... OK.  (In this case ``stability'' would seem to be in the eye of
the beholder, because 2.30.2 has a clear and seriously debilitating
glitch, but all the releases from 2.91.9 onward have that fixed.)

>>>You should ask GNOME folks why they stopped update the 2.x version.
>>
>> I am guessing that they would probably say that it was because they moved
>> on to work on 3.x. No?
>
>Yep. MATE is trying to fork GNOME 2 and keep it alive.
>
>http://mate-desktop.org/

Hummm... never heard of that before.  But I just looked at the "About" page
on that web site.  Unfortunately, it doesn't answer the obvious question...
Why fork?  Why not just go with the flow and work with the other chaps who
(it seems) are pushing ahead to GNOME 3.x?

(Forgive me.  I am entirely ignorant about any of this stuff.  I really
don't know any of the history or politics of anything even remotely connected
to GNOME.  I only know that, in general, forks are Bad, because they imply
fracturing of a development community.)

>> I understand your difficulty here. However I am inclined to ask if you
>> have been laboring under this unfortunate impediment since circa Sept. 28
>> 2010.
>
>Who care about the date? It is a latest stable version. We finally got
>this bug report in 2012! It took about one and half year for anyone to
>find this bug. It shows that how many people click on the help?

Well, the long gap between the bug's first existance and its first formal
report is indeed rather surprising.  But keep in mind that not everyone who
sees a bug will make a formal report about it.  Many folks who are new
(or new-ish) to FreeBSD or to GNOME may be hesitant to file formal reports
because either they think (incorrectly) that they must have done something
wrong (e.g. during installation) or else they don't want to cause any
``trouble'' to/for the developers, or perhaps they are just (wrongly)
intimidated by the mechanics of the PR filing process.

I certainly would not assume that nobody had ever even noticed that Help
didn't work before now (e.g. in gthumb, evince, braceros).  It is, I think,
a testament to the skill of the developers of these packages that their
individual user interfaces are sufficiently intutive that people, including
myself, can struggle along and make productive use of these things for
quite some time even in the total absence of documentation.  (I knew about
the problem myself a couple of months ago, but was never motivated to file
anything about it until just recently.  I myself believed for awhile that
the problem must have arisen from something that I had screwed up during
installation.)

>Thanks for offer. But sorry, I do not allow anyone to donate me now
>until I can actually work on FreeBSD much more like what I did two
>years ago. What you did last a few days have 'donated' to me, so
>thanks for find bug and submit patch!

You are more than welcome.  Thank you for your service to the FreeBSD
community.

Even if you won't accept any from me, please do keep in mind those
Genica brand ``mobile racks'' (removable drive holder thingies).
I really have found them to be most useful.  Certainly, this ``manual''
way of swapping out one's OS is arguably not as elegant as, say, Xen
or other such things, but the upside is that as you are doing development
work, you never have to wonder if the problem you are looking at is
actually due to the code you are working on, or if it is maybe due to
the code that is bridging the gap beteen the virtual handware and the
real hardware.  (Geeks.com was selling those things dirt cheap for
awhile.  I have a message to them pending, to see if they still stock
them.)


Regards,
rfg
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Kevin Oberman-3
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
<[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> In message <CADLFttf=tUxw5y4Yte+f=[hidden email]>
> , you wrote:
>
>>>>You should ask GNOME folks why they stopped update the 2.x version.
>>>
>>> I am guessing that they would probably say that it was because they moved
>>> on to work on 3.x. No?
>>
>>Yep. MATE is trying to fork GNOME 2 and keep it alive.
>>
>>http://mate-desktop.org/
>
> Hummm... never heard of that before.  But I just looked at the "About" page
> on that web site.  Unfortunately, it doesn't answer the obvious question...
> Why fork?  Why not just go with the flow and work with the other chaps who
> (it seems) are pushing ahead to GNOME 3.x?

Work on Gnome3 has been on-going, but it is very Linux-centric and
things like devkit are central to it and very hard to port of FreeBSD.

> (Forgive me.  I am entirely ignorant about any of this stuff.  I really
> don't know any of the history or politics of anything even remotely connected
> to GNOME.  I only know that, in general, forks are Bad, because they imply
> fracturing of a development community.)

This is more of a fracturing of the user community. If you look at
Gnome3, it bears little resemblance to Gnome2. And the changes are
very much functional, not just cosmetic. The Gnome team (not the
FreeBSD one) decided that a standardized, non-modifiable look and feel
was needed by Gnome.

As a  result, Gnome3 offers little ability to modify the default
operation. They decided that minimizing (iconifying) windows was not
needed, so it's gone. Last I looked (which is not even close to
recently) they had removed almost all setting options from the
desktop. Much of the user community simply rebelled. many either
reused to update or switched to KDE. While the Gnome team (for whom I
am NOT speaking) has ported much of Gnome3 and many people run it, it
is still lacking too much system integration to be a replacement for
Gnome2. and, if if did, I would not update to it. I want focus follows
pointer and no auto-raise.

>>> I understand your difficulty here. However I am inclined to ask if you
>>> have been laboring under this unfortunate impediment since circa Sept. 28
>>> 2010.
>>
>>Who care about the date? It is a latest stable version. We finally got
>>this bug report in 2012! It took about one and half year for anyone to
>>find this bug. It shows that how many people click on the help?
>
> Well, the long gap between the bug's first existance and its first formal
> report is indeed rather surprising.  But keep in mind that not everyone who
> sees a bug will make a formal report about it.  Many folks who are new
> (or new-ish) to FreeBSD or to GNOME may be hesitant to file formal reports
> because either they think (incorrectly) that they must have done something
> wrong (e.g. during installation) or else they don't want to cause any
> ``trouble'' to/for the developers, or perhaps they are just (wrongly)
> intimidated by the mechanics of the PR filing process.

Actually, a fix was submitted for this on April 28 and it has been
committed, so yelp has worked for me for a couple of weeks and for
everyone who updates their yelp. (I worked with Jody Caldwell to get
the PR submitted, but he submitted the one-line fix.) Note this this
was a one-line bug fix, not an upgrade to a development version of
yelp. I think two weeks after PR submission to commit is not all that
bad. (Yes, a PR had not been submitted because Jody was unsure of how
to submit one, but it only took one message from me describing it
before he submitted it.)

> I certainly would not assume that nobody had ever even noticed that Help
> didn't work before now (e.g. in gthumb, evince, braceros).  It is, I think,
> a testament to the skill of the developers of these packages that their
> individual user interfaces are sufficiently intuitive that people, including
> myself, can struggle along and make productive use of these things for
> quite some time even in the total absence of documentation.  (I knew about
> the problem myself a couple of months ago, but was never motivated to file
> anything about it until just recently.  I myself believed for awhile that
> the problem must have arisen from something that I had screwed up during
> installation.)

Works fine for me with the latest yelp port.

Again, I am onlhy speaking my views as I am mot a member of the Gnome
team and don't speak or them.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: [hidden email]
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Ronald F. Guilmette-2

In message <[hidden email]>
, Kevin Oberman <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Work on Gnome3 has been on-going, but it is very Linux-centric and
>things like devkit are central to it and very hard to port of FreeBSD.

That is, quite certainly, unfortunate.

>This is more of a fracturing of the user community. If you look at
>Gnome3, it bears little resemblance to Gnome2. And the changes are
>very much functional, not just cosmetic. The Gnome team (not the
>FreeBSD one) decided that a standardized, non-modifiable look and feel
>was needed by Gnome.

That also is quite unfortunate.  (I also am a fan of flexibility, as
long as reasonably good defaults are avaiable for everything.)

>As a  result, Gnome3 offers little ability to modify the default
>operation.

Yecch.

>They decided that minimizing (iconifying) windows was not
>needed, so it's gone.

Yecch again.  (This alone would be enough to make _me_ never want to use
Gnome3.)

>Last I looked (which is not even close to
>recently) they had removed almost all setting options from the
>desktop. Much of the user community simply rebelled.

Given everything you just described, I can well understand why.

>Actually, a fix was submitted for this on April 28 and it has been
>committed, so yelp has worked for me for a couple of weeks and for
>everyone who updates their yelp. (I worked with Jody Caldwell to get
>the PR submitted, but he submitted the one-line fix.)

Hummm... well, I guss that somebhow I missed picking that up.  Sorry.
I really had thought that I had a fairly up-to-date ports tree, but
maybe not quite up-to-date enough.

>Note this this
>was a one-line bug fix, not an upgrade to a development version of yelp.

Yes.

>I think two weeks after PR submission to commit is not all that bad.

Agreed.

Anyway, thanks for explaining the state of affairs vis-a-vis Gnome2/3.
I really didn't know about any of that, and it's been quite enlightening.


Regards,
rfg
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: yelp update ?

Kevin Oberman-3
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
<[hidden email]> wrote:
>>Actually, a fix was submitted for this on April 28 and it has been
>>committed, so yelp has worked for me for a couple of weeks and for
>>everyone who updates their yelp. (I worked with Jody Caldwell to get
>>the PR submitted, but he submitted the one-line fix.)
>
> Hummm... well, I guss that somebhow I missed picking that up.  Sorry.
> I really had thought that I had a fairly up-to-date ports tree, but
> maybe not quite up-to-date enough.

Not really hard to do as the fix was submitted on April 28 and
committed two days ago or less than 24 hours before you sent your
prior message.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: [hidden email]
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Loading...