|
Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please tell me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010? I ask because, as it happens, there was a small but critical change made to one of the files in yelp quite along time ago, and in the absence of this small change, the built-in Help functionality of gthumb, evince, braceros, and dog only knows how many other Gnome applications simply will not work. The change in question is as follows: *** yelp.desktop.in.in-20100803124138 2010-08-03 12:41:38.000000000 -0700 --- yelp.desktop.in.in 2012-05-10 04:39:24.000000000 -0700 *************** *** 3,7 **** _Comment=Get help with GNOME OnlyShowIn=GNOME; ! Exec=yelp Icon=help-browser StartupNotify=true --- 3,7 ---- _Comment=Get help with GNOME OnlyShowIn=GNOME; ! Exec=yelp %u Icon=help-browser StartupNotify=true _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
<[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please tell > me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010? Because it's latest version of GNOME 2.x. You should ask GNOME folks why they stopped update the 2.x version. > I ask because, as it happens, there was a small but critical change made > to one of the files in yelp quite along time ago, and in the absence of > this small change, the built-in Help functionality of gthumb, evince, > braceros, and dog only knows how many other Gnome applications simply > will not work. > > The change in question is as follows: All of your reports in last a few days are already in the PR in a few weeks ago with patch available. Before you ask me why I do not commit it? Because I have GNOME 3 installed and I can't test GNOME 2 until I uninstall GNOME 3 and test GNOME 2 to allow me to touch a lot of PRs. Cheers, Mezz > *** yelp.desktop.in.in-20100803124138 2010-08-03 12:41:38.000000000 -0700 > --- yelp.desktop.in.in 2012-05-10 04:39:24.000000000 -0700 > *************** > *** 3,7 **** > _Comment=Get help with GNOME > OnlyShowIn=GNOME; > ! Exec=yelp > Icon=help-browser > StartupNotify=true > --- 3,7 ---- > _Comment=Get help with GNOME > OnlyShowIn=GNOME; > ! Exec=yelp %u > Icon=help-browser > StartupNotify=true > _______________________________________________ > [hidden email] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" -- [hidden email] - [hidden email] FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [hidden email] _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Ronald F. Guilmette-2
Hi Ronald,
I can confirm that I can't see help in evince both with this patch, and w/o it. Should I do anything extra to make it work? Ronald F. Guilmette wrote on 10.05.2012 15:40: > Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please tell > me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010? > > I ask because, as it happens, there was a small but critical change made > to one of the files in yelp quite along time ago, and in the absence of > this small change, the built-in Help functionality of gthumb, evince, > braceros, and dog only knows how many other Gnome applications simply > will not work. > > The change in question is as follows: > > > *** yelp.desktop.in.in-20100803124138 2010-08-03 12:41:38.000000000 -0700 > --- yelp.desktop.in.in 2012-05-10 04:39:24.000000000 -0700 > *************** > *** 3,7 **** > _Comment=Get help with GNOME > OnlyShowIn=GNOME; > ! Exec=yelp > Icon=help-browser > StartupNotify=true > --- 3,7 ---- > _Comment=Get help with GNOME > OnlyShowIn=GNOME; > ! Exec=yelp %u > Icon=help-browser > StartupNotify=true -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Ronald, > > I can confirm that I can't see help in evince both with this patch, and w/o > it. Should I do anything extra to make it work? A complete patch is in ports/167386. The patch needs to be edited by not need to change the X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Version and maybe Categories too. Will need to add 'desktopfileutils' in USE_GNOME and manual runs update-desktop-database in post-patch if yelp's Makefile doesn't has it already. Same goes for add shared-mime-info dependency and manual runs update-mime-database in post-patch. If it works for you, feel free to commit patch and close the PR. Cheers, Mezz > Ronald F. Guilmette wrote on 10.05.2012 15:40: > >> Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please >> tell >> me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010? >> >> I ask because, as it happens, there was a small but critical change made >> to one of the files in yelp quite along time ago, and in the absence of >> this small change, the built-in Help functionality of gthumb, evince, >> braceros, and dog only knows how many other Gnome applications simply >> will not work. >> >> The change in question is as follows: >> >> >> *** yelp.desktop.in.in-20100803124138 2010-08-03 12:41:38.000000000 >> -0700 >> --- yelp.desktop.in.in 2012-05-10 04:39:24.000000000 -0700 >> *************** >> *** 3,7 **** >> _Comment=Get help with GNOME >> OnlyShowIn=GNOME; >> ! Exec=yelp >> Icon=help-browser >> StartupNotify=true >> --- 3,7 ---- >> _Comment=Get help with GNOME >> OnlyShowIn=GNOME; >> ! Exec=yelp %u >> Icon=help-browser >> StartupNotify=true > > > > > -- > Regards, > Ruslan > > Tinderboxing kills... the drives. -- [hidden email] - [hidden email] FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [hidden email] _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jeremy Messenger
<[hidden email]> wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi Ronald, >> >> I can confirm that I can't see help in evince both with this patch, and w/o >> it. Should I do anything extra to make it work? > > A complete patch is in ports/167386. The patch needs to be edited by > not need to change the X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Version and maybe Categories > too. > > Will need to add 'desktopfileutils' in USE_GNOME and manual runs > update-desktop-database in post-patch if yelp's Makefile doesn't has > it already. Same goes for add shared-mime-info dependency and manual > runs update-mime-database in post-patch. > > If it works for you, feel free to commit patch and close the PR. Pav has committed it, so nevermind. Thanks Pav! Cheers, Mezz > Cheers, > Mezz > > >> Ronald F. Guilmette wrote on 10.05.2012 15:40: >> >>> Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please >>> tell >>> me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010? >>> >>> I ask because, as it happens, there was a small but critical change made >>> to one of the files in yelp quite along time ago, and in the absence of >>> this small change, the built-in Help functionality of gthumb, evince, >>> braceros, and dog only knows how many other Gnome applications simply >>> will not work. >>> >>> The change in question is as follows: >>> >>> >>> *** yelp.desktop.in.in-20100803124138 2010-08-03 12:41:38.000000000 >>> -0700 >>> --- yelp.desktop.in.in 2012-05-10 04:39:24.000000000 -0700 >>> *************** >>> *** 3,7 **** >>> _Comment=Get help with GNOME >>> OnlyShowIn=GNOME; >>> ! Exec=yelp >>> Icon=help-browser >>> StartupNotify=true >>> --- 3,7 ---- >>> _Comment=Get help with GNOME >>> OnlyShowIn=GNOME; >>> ! Exec=yelp %u >>> Icon=help-browser >>> StartupNotify=true >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Ruslan >> >> Tinderboxing kills... the drives. > > > -- > [hidden email] - [hidden email] > FreeBSD GNOME Team > http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [hidden email] -- [hidden email] - [hidden email] FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [hidden email] _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Jeremy Messenger-2
Hi Jeremy,
Jeremy Messenger wrote on 10.05.2012 18:40: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov<[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi Ronald, >> >> I can confirm that I can't see help in evince both with this patch, and w/o >> it. Should I do anything extra to make it work? > > A complete patch is in ports/167386. The patch needs to be edited by > not need to change the X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Version and maybe Categories > too. > > Will need to add 'desktopfileutils' in USE_GNOME and manual runs > update-desktop-database in post-patch if yelp's Makefile doesn't has > it already. Same goes for add shared-mime-info dependency and manual > runs update-mime-database in post-patch. > > If it works for you, feel free to commit patch and close the PR. > > Cheers, > Mezz Yes, I already found this PR. The only thing that's need to be added is this: MimeType=x-scheme-handler/ghelp;x-scheme-handler/help;x-scheme-handler/info;x-scheme-handler/man; All other changes to yelp.desktop are not relevant and seems were directly copied from linuxmint forum. Ok, thanks. I'll check if databases updates after yelp reinstall and commit it. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Jeremy Messenger-2
Jeremy Messenger wrote on 10.05.2012 18:43:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jeremy Messenger > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov<[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Hi Ronald, >>> >>> I can confirm that I can't see help in evince both with this patch, and w/o >>> it. Should I do anything extra to make it work? >> >> A complete patch is in ports/167386. The patch needs to be edited by >> not need to change the X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Version and maybe Categories >> too. >> >> Will need to add 'desktopfileutils' in USE_GNOME and manual runs >> update-desktop-database in post-patch if yelp's Makefile doesn't has >> it already. Same goes for add shared-mime-info dependency and manual >> runs update-mime-database in post-patch. >> >> If it works for you, feel free to commit patch and close the PR. > > Pav has committed it, so nevermind. Thanks Pav! > > Cheers, > Mezz No, he just added yelp to RUN_DEPENDS. But it will not work by itself. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Jeremy Messenger-2
Jeremy Messenger wrote on 10.05.2012 18:43:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jeremy Messenger > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov<[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Hi Ronald, >>> >>> I can confirm that I can't see help in evince both with this patch, and w/o >>> it. Should I do anything extra to make it work? >> >> A complete patch is in ports/167386. The patch needs to be edited by >> not need to change the X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Version and maybe Categories >> too. >> >> Will need to add 'desktopfileutils' in USE_GNOME and manual runs >> update-desktop-database in post-patch if yelp's Makefile doesn't has >> it already. Same goes for add shared-mime-info dependency and manual >> runs update-mime-database in post-patch. >> >> If it works for you, feel free to commit patch and close the PR. > > Pav has committed it, so nevermind. Thanks Pav! > > Cheers, > Mezz Ah, I now see. Sorry :) -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In reply to this post by Jeremy Messenger-2
In message <CADLFttfPnW=[hidden email]> , Jeremy Messenger <[hidden email]> wrote: >On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette ><[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >> Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please tell >> me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010? > >Because it's latest version of GNOME 2.x. Regarding that assertion... What is in the ports tree is yelp version 2.30.2. But as you can see here: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/yelp/ There were several more 2.x.x versions after that, presumably all generally compatible with GNOME 2.x, specifically: 2.31.1 2.31.2 2.31.3 2.31.4 2.31.5 2.31.6 2.31.7 2.91.8 2.91.9 <==== fixes the %u issue 2.91.10 2.91.90 2.91.91 2.91.92 >You should ask GNOME folks why they stopped update the 2.x version. I am guessing that they would probably say that it was because they moved on to work on 3.x. No? >All of your reports in last a few days are already in the PR in a few >weeks ago with patch available. Before you ask me why I do not commit >it? You read my mind. :-) >Because I have GNOME 3 installed and I can't test GNOME 2 until I >uninstall GNOME 3 and test GNOME 2 to allow me to touch a lot of PRs. I understand your difficulty here. However I am inclined to ask if you have been laboring under this unfortunate impediment since circa Sept. 28, 2010. Well, in any event, to the extent that I can, I'd like to be of assistance. I do have a spare (older) Athlon XP system that I could probably afford to ship to you, if you are not too far away from me. (But it is _only_ the tower... no monitor, keybpard, or mouse.) And also, I have a couple of these things lying around that I'm not using (and a few that I am): http://www.amazon.com/Genica-Mobile-Rack-Removable-Black/dp/B000FA0W80/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1336689460&sr=1-2 Personally, I have found them to be very handy for developing on multiple playforms and/or under multiple environments. I probably could scrounge up a spare drive or two also. Please let me know if any of this stuff would be at all helpful. I do understand that it is difficult to develop stuff when you hare dealing with multiple versions of something that are constantly changing out from under you all of the time. Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
<[hidden email]> wrote: > > In message <CADLFttfPnW=[hidden email]> > , Jeremy Messenger <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette >><[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Excuse me if this is an impertinent question, but could someone please tell >>> me why the FreeBSD port of yelp has not been updated since Sept 28, 2010? >> >>Because it's latest version of GNOME 2.x. > > Regarding that assertion... > > What is in the ports tree is yelp version 2.30.2. But as you can see here: > > http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/yelp/ > > There were several more 2.x.x versions after that, presumably all generally > compatible with GNOME 2.x, specifically: > > 2.31.1 > 2.31.2 > 2.31.3 > 2.31.4 > 2.31.5 > 2.31.6 > 2.31.7 > > 2.91.8 > 2.91.9 <==== fixes the %u issue > 2.91.10 > 2.91.90 > 2.91.91 > 2.91.92 The odd number is a development version. Even number is a stable version. Therefore, 2.30.2 is a latest version of 2.x. http://library.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/ >>You should ask GNOME folks why they stopped update the 2.x version. > > I am guessing that they would probably say that it was because they moved > on to work on 3.x. No? Yep. MATE is trying to fork GNOME 2 and keep it alive. http://mate-desktop.org/ http://wiki.mate-desktop.org/roadmap I want to try to work on MATE in this summer. I am hoping to finish GNOME 3.4.x in June. >>All of your reports in last a few days are already in the PR in a few >>weeks ago with patch available. Before you ask me why I do not commit >>it? > > You read my mind. > :-) > >>Because I have GNOME 3 installed and I can't test GNOME 2 until I >>uninstall GNOME 3 and test GNOME 2 to allow me to touch a lot of PRs. > > I understand your difficulty here. However I am inclined to ask if you > have been laboring under this unfortunate impediment since circa Sept. 28, > 2010. Who care about the date? It is a latest stable version. We finally got this bug report in 2012! It took about one and half year for anyone to find this bug. It shows that how many people click on the help? > Well, in any event, to the extent that I can, I'd like to be of assistance. > I do have a spare (older) Athlon XP system that I could probably afford to > ship to you, if you are not too far away from me. (But it is _only_ the > tower... no monitor, keybpard, or mouse.) And also, I have a couple of > these things lying around that I'm not using (and a few that I am): > > http://www.amazon.com/Genica-Mobile-Rack-Removable-Black/dp/B000FA0W80/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1336689460&sr=1-2 > > Personally, I have found them to be very handy for developing on multiple > playforms and/or under multiple environments. > > I probably could scrounge up a spare drive or two also. Please let me know > if any of this stuff would be at all helpful. > > I do understand that it is difficult to develop stuff when you hare dealing > with multiple versions of something that are constantly changing out from > under you all of the time. Thanks for offer. But sorry, I do not allow anyone to donate me now until I can actually work on FreeBSD much more like what I did two years ago. What you did last a few days have 'donated' to me, so thanks for find bug and submit patch! BTW: freebsd-gnome@ and gnome@ are same. Removing one of it from CC. Cheers, Mezz > Regards, > rfg -- [hidden email] - [hidden email] FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [hidden email] _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In message <CADLFttf=tUxw5y4Yte+f=[hidden email]> , you wrote: >> 2.31.1 >> 2.31.2 >> 2.31.3 >> 2.31.4 >> 2.31.5 >> 2.31.6 >> 2.31.7 >> >> 2.91.8 >> 2.91.9 <==== fixes the %u issue >> 2.91.10 >> 2.91.90 >> 2.91.91 >> 2.91.92 > >The odd number is a development version. Even number is a stable >version. Therefore, 2.30.2 is a latest version of 2.x. Ummm... OK. (In this case ``stability'' would seem to be in the eye of the beholder, because 2.30.2 has a clear and seriously debilitating glitch, but all the releases from 2.91.9 onward have that fixed.) >>>You should ask GNOME folks why they stopped update the 2.x version. >> >> I am guessing that they would probably say that it was because they moved >> on to work on 3.x. No? > >Yep. MATE is trying to fork GNOME 2 and keep it alive. > >http://mate-desktop.org/ Hummm... never heard of that before. But I just looked at the "About" page on that web site. Unfortunately, it doesn't answer the obvious question... Why fork? Why not just go with the flow and work with the other chaps who (it seems) are pushing ahead to GNOME 3.x? (Forgive me. I am entirely ignorant about any of this stuff. I really don't know any of the history or politics of anything even remotely connected to GNOME. I only know that, in general, forks are Bad, because they imply fracturing of a development community.) >> I understand your difficulty here. However I am inclined to ask if you >> have been laboring under this unfortunate impediment since circa Sept. 28 >> 2010. > >Who care about the date? It is a latest stable version. We finally got >this bug report in 2012! It took about one and half year for anyone to >find this bug. It shows that how many people click on the help? Well, the long gap between the bug's first existance and its first formal report is indeed rather surprising. But keep in mind that not everyone who sees a bug will make a formal report about it. Many folks who are new (or new-ish) to FreeBSD or to GNOME may be hesitant to file formal reports because either they think (incorrectly) that they must have done something wrong (e.g. during installation) or else they don't want to cause any ``trouble'' to/for the developers, or perhaps they are just (wrongly) intimidated by the mechanics of the PR filing process. I certainly would not assume that nobody had ever even noticed that Help didn't work before now (e.g. in gthumb, evince, braceros). It is, I think, a testament to the skill of the developers of these packages that their individual user interfaces are sufficiently intutive that people, including myself, can struggle along and make productive use of these things for quite some time even in the total absence of documentation. (I knew about the problem myself a couple of months ago, but was never motivated to file anything about it until just recently. I myself believed for awhile that the problem must have arisen from something that I had screwed up during installation.) >Thanks for offer. But sorry, I do not allow anyone to donate me now >until I can actually work on FreeBSD much more like what I did two >years ago. What you did last a few days have 'donated' to me, so >thanks for find bug and submit patch! You are more than welcome. Thank you for your service to the FreeBSD community. Even if you won't accept any from me, please do keep in mind those Genica brand ``mobile racks'' (removable drive holder thingies). I really have found them to be most useful. Certainly, this ``manual'' way of swapping out one's OS is arguably not as elegant as, say, Xen or other such things, but the upside is that as you are doing development work, you never have to wonder if the problem you are looking at is actually due to the code you are working on, or if it is maybe due to the code that is bridging the gap beteen the virtual handware and the real hardware. (Geeks.com was selling those things dirt cheap for awhile. I have a message to them pending, to see if they still stock them.) Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
<[hidden email]> wrote: > > In message <CADLFttf=tUxw5y4Yte+f=[hidden email]> > , you wrote: > >>>>You should ask GNOME folks why they stopped update the 2.x version. >>> >>> I am guessing that they would probably say that it was because they moved >>> on to work on 3.x. No? >> >>Yep. MATE is trying to fork GNOME 2 and keep it alive. >> >>http://mate-desktop.org/ > > Hummm... never heard of that before. But I just looked at the "About" page > on that web site. Unfortunately, it doesn't answer the obvious question... > Why fork? Why not just go with the flow and work with the other chaps who > (it seems) are pushing ahead to GNOME 3.x? Work on Gnome3 has been on-going, but it is very Linux-centric and things like devkit are central to it and very hard to port of FreeBSD. > (Forgive me. I am entirely ignorant about any of this stuff. I really > don't know any of the history or politics of anything even remotely connected > to GNOME. I only know that, in general, forks are Bad, because they imply > fracturing of a development community.) This is more of a fracturing of the user community. If you look at Gnome3, it bears little resemblance to Gnome2. And the changes are very much functional, not just cosmetic. The Gnome team (not the FreeBSD one) decided that a standardized, non-modifiable look and feel was needed by Gnome. As a result, Gnome3 offers little ability to modify the default operation. They decided that minimizing (iconifying) windows was not needed, so it's gone. Last I looked (which is not even close to recently) they had removed almost all setting options from the desktop. Much of the user community simply rebelled. many either reused to update or switched to KDE. While the Gnome team (for whom I am NOT speaking) has ported much of Gnome3 and many people run it, it is still lacking too much system integration to be a replacement for Gnome2. and, if if did, I would not update to it. I want focus follows pointer and no auto-raise. >>> I understand your difficulty here. However I am inclined to ask if you >>> have been laboring under this unfortunate impediment since circa Sept. 28 >>> 2010. >> >>Who care about the date? It is a latest stable version. We finally got >>this bug report in 2012! It took about one and half year for anyone to >>find this bug. It shows that how many people click on the help? > > Well, the long gap between the bug's first existance and its first formal > report is indeed rather surprising. But keep in mind that not everyone who > sees a bug will make a formal report about it. Many folks who are new > (or new-ish) to FreeBSD or to GNOME may be hesitant to file formal reports > because either they think (incorrectly) that they must have done something > wrong (e.g. during installation) or else they don't want to cause any > ``trouble'' to/for the developers, or perhaps they are just (wrongly) > intimidated by the mechanics of the PR filing process. Actually, a fix was submitted for this on April 28 and it has been committed, so yelp has worked for me for a couple of weeks and for everyone who updates their yelp. (I worked with Jody Caldwell to get the PR submitted, but he submitted the one-line fix.) Note this this was a one-line bug fix, not an upgrade to a development version of yelp. I think two weeks after PR submission to commit is not all that bad. (Yes, a PR had not been submitted because Jody was unsure of how to submit one, but it only took one message from me describing it before he submitted it.) > I certainly would not assume that nobody had ever even noticed that Help > didn't work before now (e.g. in gthumb, evince, braceros). It is, I think, > a testament to the skill of the developers of these packages that their > individual user interfaces are sufficiently intuitive that people, including > myself, can struggle along and make productive use of these things for > quite some time even in the total absence of documentation. (I knew about > the problem myself a couple of months ago, but was never motivated to file > anything about it until just recently. I myself believed for awhile that > the problem must have arisen from something that I had screwed up during > installation.) Works fine for me with the latest yelp port. Again, I am onlhy speaking my views as I am mot a member of the Gnome team and don't speak or them. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: [hidden email] _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
In message <[hidden email]> , Kevin Oberman <[hidden email]> wrote: >Work on Gnome3 has been on-going, but it is very Linux-centric and >things like devkit are central to it and very hard to port of FreeBSD. That is, quite certainly, unfortunate. >This is more of a fracturing of the user community. If you look at >Gnome3, it bears little resemblance to Gnome2. And the changes are >very much functional, not just cosmetic. The Gnome team (not the >FreeBSD one) decided that a standardized, non-modifiable look and feel >was needed by Gnome. That also is quite unfortunate. (I also am a fan of flexibility, as long as reasonably good defaults are avaiable for everything.) >As a result, Gnome3 offers little ability to modify the default >operation. Yecch. >They decided that minimizing (iconifying) windows was not >needed, so it's gone. Yecch again. (This alone would be enough to make _me_ never want to use Gnome3.) >Last I looked (which is not even close to >recently) they had removed almost all setting options from the >desktop. Much of the user community simply rebelled. Given everything you just described, I can well understand why. >Actually, a fix was submitted for this on April 28 and it has been >committed, so yelp has worked for me for a couple of weeks and for >everyone who updates their yelp. (I worked with Jody Caldwell to get >the PR submitted, but he submitted the one-line fix.) Hummm... well, I guss that somebhow I missed picking that up. Sorry. I really had thought that I had a fairly up-to-date ports tree, but maybe not quite up-to-date enough. >Note this this >was a one-line bug fix, not an upgrade to a development version of yelp. Yes. >I think two weeks after PR submission to commit is not all that bad. Agreed. Anyway, thanks for explaining the state of affairs vis-a-vis Gnome2/3. I really didn't know about any of that, and it's been quite enlightening. Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
|
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
<[hidden email]> wrote: >>Actually, a fix was submitted for this on April 28 and it has been >>committed, so yelp has worked for me for a couple of weeks and for >>everyone who updates their yelp. (I worked with Jody Caldwell to get >>the PR submitted, but he submitted the one-line fix.) > > Hummm... well, I guss that somebhow I missed picking that up. Sorry. > I really had thought that I had a fairly up-to-date ports tree, but > maybe not quite up-to-date enough. Not really hard to do as the fix was submitted on April 28 and committed two days ago or less than 24 hours before you sent your prior message. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: [hidden email] _______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]" |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
